Mechanisms of Cannabinoid Analgesia

INVESTIGATOR: Ian Meng, Ph.D.

STUDY LOCATION: University of California, San Francisco

PROJECT TITLE: Mechanisms of Cannabinoid Analgesia

PROJECT TYPE: Pre-Clinical Study

STATUS: COMPLETE

RESULTS:

The full results of this study were published in PAIN. Below is a brief summary of these results.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that cannabinoid drugs, which include the main active ingredient of marijuana delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, may be useful for the treatment of trigeminal pain syndromes, including headache. These studies examined the effect of one cannabinoid drug, WIN 55,212-2, on the transmission of pain signals involved in head pain. The activity of pain transmission neurons in the anesthetized rat was monitored after cannabinoid administration. Results from these studies demonstrated clear inhibition of neuronal responses to noxious heat stimulation of the facial skin. In additional studies, the ability of the rat to actively withdraw from heating the face was delayed by cannabinoid drug administration. The ability of cannabinoids to delay the response to painful stimulation, combined with the demonstration of cannabinoid-induced inhibition of pain transmission signals, provides scientific evidence for a direct analgesic effect of cannabinoids.

ABSTRACT:

Cannabinoids, which include the major psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, have a long history of use for the treatment of migraines. The mechanisms by which cannabinoids may reduce headache pain, however, remain unknown. This proposal is focused on cannabinoid inhibition of nociceptive signals relevant to headache. Two complementary experimental approaches will be employed. First, using extracellular single unit recordings in anesthetized rats, the effect of cannabinoid agonists on the activity of medullary dorsal horn neurons that receive primary afferent input from the dura will be tested. Second, a novel behavioral method for assessing the impact of cannabinoids on the aversive component of pain produced by dural inflammation will be employed. Behavioral pain tests commonly define analgesia as a reduction in pain related behaviors (e.g. paw flinches) or a delay in nociceptive reflexes. Unfortunately, inflammation of the dura does not produce a quantifiable, overt behavior to assess head pain. To solve this problem, the effect of dural inflammation on place conditioning, a behavioral model commonly used in drug addiction research, will be utilized to determine the impact of cannabinoids on headache-induced aversion and cardiovascular responses. The results from this research will help determine whether cannabinoids are a useful class of medication for headache pain patients as either a primary or adjuvant therapy.

PUBLICATIONS:

Type:

Title:

Journal Article A.M. Papanastassiou, H.L. Fields, I.D. Meng. Local application of the cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55,212-2, to spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis differentially affects nociceptive and non-nociceptive neurons. Pain. 2004 Feb;107(3):267-75.

Weed Is Everywhere, So Why Is It Still A Medical Mystery?

Seeker, June 23, 2019


Regulators hungry for evidence as FDA weighs allowing CBD in food, dietary supplements

Angelica LaVito, CNBC, May 31, 2019

Food and Drug Administration regulators grilled manufacturers and advocates Friday for evidence that CBD actually does anything they claim it does.

Companies are adding CBD, short for cannabidiol, to just about everything, including makeup, tea, pet treats and soft drinks — even though there's little data to support the many claims of its benefits. FDA regulators trying to learn more about the cannabis compound held the agency's first hearing on it Friday.

More than 100 people testified at the hearing. Speakers pushed the FDA to set up a regulatory framework to legally add CBD to food products and dietary supplements. They praised CBD and the purported benefits — and FDA panelists repeatedly asked for data. Scientists warned of the little research and many potential risks CBD brings.

Read the story here


Three years into legal cannabis and California still doesn’t have a reliable test for driving while high

Brooke Staggs, Orange County Register, May 31, 2019

Nearly three years after California voters approved a cannabis legalization bill that promised, among other things, to clarify the issue of driving while high, researchers and law enforcement have few concrete answers about a potentially deadly problem.

It’s unclear, for example, if marijuana-related arrests or car crashes have increased statewide. It’s up to each county to track that data, and many still don’t distinguish between cannabis and other drugs in their arrest and accident reports.

There also aren’t yet any reliable methods for testing whether drivers were actually impaired by marijuana when they’re behind the wheel. Research in this area is hampered by federal law and left scrambling to catch up with the wave of marijuana legalization that continues to sweep the country.

Read the rest of the article here


More News

Click here to access the CMCR news archives.

Igor Grant, MD

Marijuana as Medicine: Can We See Past the Smoke?
North American Cannabis Summit presentation January 2019 (PDF)


Igor Grant, MD

Introduction/Overview
CMCR Symposium, June 2018


Daniele Piomelli, MD, PhD, PharmD

The health impact of cannabis
CMCR Symposium, June 2018


Ziva Cooper, PhD

Therapeutic potential of cannabis for pain alone and as an adjunct to opioids
CMCR Symposium, June 2018


Iain McGregor, PhD

Medicinal cannabis research down under: Introducing the Lambert Initiative for Cannabinoid Therapeutics
CMCR Symposium, June 2018


Copyright © 2019 CENTER FOR MEDICINAL CANNABIS RESEARCH. | University of California, San Diego
cmcr@ucsd.edu | HNRP |