Vaporization as a "Smokeless" Cannabis Delivery System

INVESTIGATOR: Donald Abrams, M.D.

STUDY LOCATION: University of California, San Francisco

PROJECT TITLE: Vaporization as a "Smokeless" Cannabis Delivery System

PROJECT TYPE: Clinical Study

STATUS: COMPLETE

RESULTS:

The full results of this study have been published in the journal Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. Below is a brief summary of these results.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a vaporization system (the Volcano; VAPORMED® Inhalatoren) as a “smokeless” delivery system for inhaled marijuana. The study looked at heating marijuana to form a vapor and then comparing drug levels in the blood to those obtained from smoking an identical amount of marijuana from a cigarette. In addition, we compared the tolerability of the two methods and measured expired carbon dioxide to evaluate whether the vaporizer reduces exposure to respiratory toxins.

Eighteen healthy subjects were recruited and admitted to the inpatient ward of the General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) at San Francisco General Hospital to investigate the delivery of marijuana by vaporization compared to marijuana smoked in a standard cigarette. One dose (1.7, 3.4, or 6.8% tetrahydrocannabinol) and delivery system (smoked marijuana cigarette or vaporization system) was randomly assigned for each of the six study days. The analysis suggests that the blood levels of vaporized marijuana are similar to those of smoked marijuana. However, blood concentrations at 30 minutes after drug administration and beyond were significantly higher in vaporized marijuana as compared to smoked marijuana. In addition, the carbon monoxide levels were significantly reduced with vaporization compared with smoked marijuana. Fourteen participants preferred vaporization, 2 smoking, and 2 reported no preference. No adverse events were observed.

In this study, vaporization of marijuana was found to be a safe mode of delivery. Participants had a clear preference for vaporization over smoking as a delivery system for the marijuana used in this trial.

ABSTRACT:

The Institute of Medicine report on Marijuana as Medicine published in 1999 concluded that "scientific data indicate the potential therapeutic value of cannabinoid drugs, primarily THC, for pain relief, control of N & V, appetite stimulation; smoked marijuana, however is a crude THC delivery system that also delivers harmful substances." The report recommended that clinical trials of cannabinoid drugs for symptom management should be conducted with the goal of developing rapid onset, reliable, and safe delivery systems.

Our primary objective in this study is to evaluate the use of a vaporization system (the Volcano; VAPORMED® Inhalatoren; Tüttlingen, Germany; www.vapormed.de) as a "smokeless" delivery system for inhaled marijuana. We will compare plasma levels of delta-9-tetrahyrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol, cannabinol, and metabolites, including 11-OH-THC, in healthy volunteers after smoking one 3.95% THC marijuana cigarette (using the Foltin puff procedure) to those obtained when the same individual inhales the vaporization product of the marijuana from an identical cigarette processed through the Volcano device. In addition to plasma levels, we will also compare the THC concentration over an 8-hour time period, the subjective high experienced by the patients, and clinical evidence of cannabis effect by evaluating conjunctival hyperemia and heart rate.

We will also compare the tolerability of the two methods of ingestion, and we will measure expired carbon monoxide to evaluate whether the vaporizer reduces exposure to respiratory toxins. Twelve participants will be admitted for a 2-day stay at the General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) at San Francisco General Hospital. They will be randomly assigned to either inhalation of products of a smoked marijuana cigarette or the vaporization products produced by use of the Volcano device. Blood for pharmacokinetic evaluations and measurement of physiologic and psychologic effects of cannabis will be conducted by the GCRC research nursing staff who have been involved in all of our cannabis clinical trials to date. On day 2 of the stay, participants will inhale the alternative product and the same measurements will be obtained. If this study demonstrates that vaporization of cannabis produces significant blood levels and physiologic effects with a tolerable side effect profile, the Volcano may provide a rapid onset, reliable and safe delivery system to be used in future effectiveness studies of medicinal cannabis.

PUBLICATIONS:

Type:

Title:

Journal Article Abrams DI, Vizoso HP, hade SB, Jay C, Kelly ME, and Benowitz NL. (2007). Vaporization as a Smokeless Cannabis Delivery System: A Pilot Study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov;82(5):572-8. Epub 2007 Apr 11.
Meeting Abstract Abrams, D., Vizoso, H., Shade, S., Jay, C., Kelley, M.E., Benowitz, N. Vaporization as a Smokeless Cannabis Delivery System: A Pilot Study. 2nd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Cannabis as Medicine. 2005.

Weed Is Everywhere, So Why Is It Still A Medical Mystery?

Seeker, June 23, 2019


Regulators hungry for evidence as FDA weighs allowing CBD in food, dietary supplements

Angelica LaVito, CNBC, May 31, 2019

Food and Drug Administration regulators grilled manufacturers and advocates Friday for evidence that CBD actually does anything they claim it does.

Companies are adding CBD, short for cannabidiol, to just about everything, including makeup, tea, pet treats and soft drinks — even though there's little data to support the many claims of its benefits. FDA regulators trying to learn more about the cannabis compound held the agency's first hearing on it Friday.

More than 100 people testified at the hearing. Speakers pushed the FDA to set up a regulatory framework to legally add CBD to food products and dietary supplements. They praised CBD and the purported benefits — and FDA panelists repeatedly asked for data. Scientists warned of the little research and many potential risks CBD brings.

Read the story here


Three years into legal cannabis and California still doesn’t have a reliable test for driving while high

Brooke Staggs, Orange County Register, May 31, 2019

Nearly three years after California voters approved a cannabis legalization bill that promised, among other things, to clarify the issue of driving while high, researchers and law enforcement have few concrete answers about a potentially deadly problem.

It’s unclear, for example, if marijuana-related arrests or car crashes have increased statewide. It’s up to each county to track that data, and many still don’t distinguish between cannabis and other drugs in their arrest and accident reports.

There also aren’t yet any reliable methods for testing whether drivers were actually impaired by marijuana when they’re behind the wheel. Research in this area is hampered by federal law and left scrambling to catch up with the wave of marijuana legalization that continues to sweep the country.

Read the rest of the article here


More News

Click here to access the CMCR news archives.

Igor Grant, MD

Marijuana as Medicine: Can We See Past the Smoke?
North American Cannabis Summit presentation January 2019 (PDF)


Igor Grant, MD

Introduction/Overview
CMCR Symposium, June 2018


Daniele Piomelli, MD, PhD, PharmD

The health impact of cannabis
CMCR Symposium, June 2018


Ziva Cooper, PhD

Therapeutic potential of cannabis for pain alone and as an adjunct to opioids
CMCR Symposium, June 2018


Iain McGregor, PhD

Medicinal cannabis research down under: Introducing the Lambert Initiative for Cannabinoid Therapeutics
CMCR Symposium, June 2018


Copyright © 2019 CENTER FOR MEDICINAL CANNABIS RESEARCH. | University of California, San Diego
cmcr@ucsd.edu | HNRP |